The sales half of a course inbox gets all the attention. The half that comes after the money moves gets none, and it is the half that decides whether anybody recommends you.
"Paisa kat gaya but no access." "Login link nahi aaya." "Kal ka session miss ho gaya, recording kahan hai." "I want a refund." These arrive in the same Instagram DM thread as "is this good for beginners", and to a keyword matcher they are indistinguishable from a sales enquiry.
Start from what we cannot see
There is no integration with your course platform. Not Teachable, not Kajabi, not the LMS your developer built, not the Drive folder. We cannot look up an order, confirm a payment, resend a login, extend access, check whether a recording was uploaded, or issue a refund. There are no one-click integrations at all; captured leads leave as a CSV.
That is not a limitation to work around. It is the reason the whole post has one instruction: the automation's job in the support inbox is to send nothing and make sure a human sees it.
The related structural point — that a course account is holding two populations who look the same on arrival — is argued in full in the sibling post, and the launch-versus-evergreen split is a separate build problem. This one is only about what happens after the card is charged.
Support messages carry a clock that sales messages do not
A prospect who waits six hours for an answer is mildly annoyed. A buyer who has been charged and cannot get in is doing something else entirely: they are deciding, hour by hour, whether they have been scammed.
That is the real reason a cheerful automated reply is so damaging here. It is not that the words are wrong. It is that an instant, confident, on-brand message that does not solve the problem is read as evidence that nobody is actually there — and the person now has a story about your business, formed at the exact moment they were most anxious about the money.
An automated reply to "paisa kat gaya" is the single worst message this product can send on your behalf.
The refusal list, sorted by what has gone wrong
Negative keywords are the mechanism. When one matches, nothing is sent and the person waits for you rather than getting a template on top of a bad day.
Build the list in three groups, because writing it as one long list is how words get missed.
- Money.
refund,payment failed,paisa kat gaya,double charge,invoice,receipt,chargeback,cancel. Anything here is a conversation with financial consequences and no correct template. - Access.
login,password,access,not received,nahi mila,link not working,expired,otp,can't open. These look mundane and they are the most urgent messages in the inbox. - Delivery.
recording,missed the class,slides,certificate,assignment,no reply from team. Slower burning, still not automatable, because the honest answer depends on a fact you have to go and check.
Matching folds case and punctuation, so you write the word once and Refund! matches too. It matches whole words, so refund will not catch refunded — put both in. And it does not fold Indic vowel signs, so if you list Hinglish in Devanagari you are listing exact spellings, not a family of them. Most panicked messages arrive in Roman Hinglish anyway, which is where your list should be thickest.
Routing is a human commitment, not a setting
Here is the part nobody wants to hear. Turning the automation off for support messages does not answer them. It just stops you sending the wrong thing. Somebody still has to open the inbox.
So decide the two facts before you build anything: who reads the routed messages, and how often. For a solo creator that might be twice a day, morning and evening, and that is fine as long as it is real. For a small team it needs a name attached, because "the team checks it" means nobody does.
The twenty-four hour DM window makes this concrete rather than aspirational. You can reply inside a thread for twenty-four hours after their last message, and only their next message restarts that clock. A buyer who wrote on Friday night and got nothing by Sunday is not just neglected — the thread may have closed on you, and you cannot reopen it from your side. They have to write again, and by then they are writing somewhere less polite.
The one support-adjacent thing that is safe to automate
There is exactly one, and it is worth building because it removes a chunk of the pile.
A templated reply on your enrolment confirmation post, or triggered by a word you put in the welcome caption, that says where the course lives, which email address the login comes from, how long it takes to arrive, and where to write if it has not. No lookup, no personalisation, no claim that anybody has read anything. Purely the address of the information.
That is not answering a support message. It is preventing one, which is the only leverage available when the tool cannot see your platform.
Takeover, and why it matters most here
The moment you reply by hand in a thread, automation stands down in it permanently. Nothing lands underneath your considered answer about a refund. Nothing follows up two days later with a cheerful pitch to someone you are in the middle of making whole.
Templated replies are free and unlimited; a credit is spent only when the AI writes a new reply. Free tier is 100 credits with no card, packs start at ₹499. A well-built support posture spends nothing at all, because its whole design is not sending things.
No payment links, no refunds, no CRM sync, no WhatsApp, no broadcasts, no sequences. Official Graph API only. If you want the ten checks that sit in front of every send, they are documented here.